Does carbon dating work for 6 billion years
Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.
Radioactive Dating There are basically two different kinds of radioactive dating methods.
Leakey declared that the skull was 2.9 MY, and said that it “fits no previous models of human beginnings.” It was named KNM-ER-1470 (for Kenya National Museum, East Rudolf, #1470).It furnishes some good evidences that creationists often use.But we won’t discuss the C-14 method in this article.And, of course, the public doesn’t usually hear of these wrong answers.
This statement – that radiometric dates are “corrected” by reference to evolution-based index fossils – is hotly contested, but examination of the technical literature shows that it is true, in spite of what elementary textbooks say. Documented Discrepancies The general public believes that radiometric results are consistent and thus demonstrably reliable. John Woodmorappe did an extensive literature search, looking at 445 technical articles from 54 reputable geochronology and geology journals.1 These reports listed over 350 dates, measured by radiometric methods, that conflicted badly with the ages assigned to fossils found in these same strata.Between 19 several teams made a number of radiometric measurements, and the results clustered around three ages-1.8 MY, 2.4 MY, and 2.6 MY.